One of those labs found asbestos in Shower to Shower talc from the 1990s, according to an Aug. 11, 2017, court report. Imerys and J&J said the Chinese talc is safe. Itâs also partly why regulations that protect people in mines, mills, factories and schools from asbestos-laden talc donât apply to babies and others exposed to cosmetic talc â even though Baby Powder talc has at times come from the same mines as talc sold for industrial use. He homed in on a suspect: the Johnsonâs Baby Powder that Coker had used on her infant children and sprinkled on herself all her life. After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. Product Description. Since 2003, talc in Baby Powder sold in the United States has come from China through supplier Imerys Talc America, a unit of Paris-based Imerys SA and a … âWhen people really understand whatâs going on, I think it increases J&Jâs exposure a thousand-fold,â said Mark Lanier, one of the lawyers for the women in the St. Louis case. But internal documents examined by Reuters show that the company's powder was sometimes tainted with carcinogenic asbestos and that J&J kept that information from regulators and the public. Bicks rejected the Cyprus report as hearsay, saying there is no original documentation to confirm it. A third verdict, in St. Louis, was a watershed, broadening J&Jâs potential liability: The 22 plaintiffs were the first to succeed with a claim that asbestos-tainted Baby Powder and Shower to Shower talc, a longtime brand the company sold in 2012, caused ovarian cancer, which is much more common than mesothelioma. He also said that today, J&Jâs X-ray scans can detect suspect minerals at levels as low as 0.1 percent of a sample. Thatâs one of the six minerals that in their naturally occurring fibrous form are classified as asbestos. In a Sept. 6, 1974, letter, J&J told the FDA that since âa substantial safety factor can be expectedâ with talc that contains 1 percent asbestos, âmethods capable of determining less than 1% asbestos in talc are not necessary to assure the safety of cosmetic talc.â, Not everyone at the FDA thought that basing a detection method on such a calculation was a good idea. While the agencyâs cosmetics division was considering similar action on talcum powders, it asked companies to suggest testing methods. The concentrations were great enough that users âwould have, more likely than not, been exposed,â the plaintiffsâ lab report presented in several casesÂ this year concluded. J&Jâs effort to protect its iconic Baby Powder franchise by shaping research was led by physician and scientist executives. âThe asbestos fibers found raise a new issue of fact,â Hobson told the judge in a requestÂ for more time to file an opposition to J&Jâs dismissal motion. âSome of them seem rather high,âÂ the private lab wrote in its cover letter. âOur current posture with respect to the sponsorship of talc safety studies has been to initiate studies only as dictated by confrontation,â the memoÂ said. The doctor urged Ashton to consult with company lawyers because âit is not inconceivable that we could become involved in litigation.â. âProviding the FDA favorable results showing no asbestos and withholding or failing to provide unfavorable results, which show asbestos, is a form of a misrepresentation by omission,â Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Ana Viscomi said in her June ruling. 95 ($2.16/Ounce) $29.97 $29.97 J&J declined to comment further for this article. A Reuters examination of many of those documents, as well as deposition and trial testimony,Â shows that from at least 1971 to the earlyÂ 2000s,Â the companyâs raw talc and finished powders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos, and that company executives, mine managers, scientists, doctors and lawyers fretted over the problem and how to address itÂ while failing to disclose it to regulators or the public. J&J should use those records âfor maximum benefit,â Ashton said in a May 8, 1973, letterÂ to Dr Gavin Hildick-Smith, J&Jâs director of medical affairs. Later that year, another Mount Sinai researcher, mineralogist Arthur Langer, told J&J in a letterÂ that the team had found a ârelatively smallâ amount of chrysotile asbestos in Baby Powder. Johnson & Johnson is abandoning a product that it may be most identified with and has been selling for more than 100 years -- talc-based baby powder. When customers complained of skin irritation, the brothers sent packets of talc. The lawsuitÂ Coker and her husband, Roy, filed that year against J&J in Jefferson County District Court in Beaumont, Texas, is the earliest Reuters found alleging Baby Powder caused cancer. That was in 1999. Clinically Proven to Soothe The Skin, and Absorb Moisture. It had not done so as of Thursday evening. Baby Powder Lyrics: I'ma tell you the truth / Not like these girls on the loose / I'll put up with you, babe / There're somethings I won't take / Baby, don't feed me false / Yeah, that turns me off Langer, Selikoff and Kretchmer ended up on a J&J listÂ of âantagonistic personalitiesâ in a Nov. 29, 1972, memo, which described SelikoffÂ as the leader of an âattack on talc.â. Anti-inflammatory ingredients such as kaolin clay, arrowroot and plaintain leaf help soothe irritation and calms itchy skin. âWhen Mom was given this death sentence, she was the same age as I am right now,â Deckard said. FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said the agency continues to receive a lot of questions about talc cosmetics. By 1973, Tom Shelley, director of J&Jâs Central Research Laboratories in New Jersey, was looking into acquiring patents on a process that a British mineralogist and J&J consultant was developing to separate talc from tremolite. J&J objected. Homemade Baby Powder: A Natural Chamomile & Lavender Powder And while talc products contributed just $420 million to J&Jâs $76.5 billion in revenue last year, Baby Powder is considered an essential facet of the healthcare-products makerâs carefully tended image as a caring company â a âsacred cow,â as one 2003 internal email put it. âAnd these might be classified as asbestos fiber.â, J&J should âprotect our powder franchiseâ by eliminating as many tiny fibers that can be inhaled in airborn talc dust as possible, Petterson wrote. An internal August reportÂ on J&Jâs âDefense of Talc Safetyâ campaign noted that independent authorities had deemed cosmetic talc products to be âfree of hazard.â It attributed âthis growing opinionâ to the dissemination to scientific and medical communities in the United States and Britain of âfavorable data from the various J&J sponsored studies.â, In 1984, FDA cosmetics chief and former J&J employee Heinz Eiermann reiterated that view. It needed work to meet the âform and styleâ requirements of the target journal, he told colleagues in a March 31, 1975, memo. A subsequent analysis of the underlying data published in 1988 determined that at least one of the workers died of mesothelioma, the cancer most closely associated with asbestos. J&J didnât tell the FDA about a 1974 testÂ by a professor at Dartmouth CollegeÂ in New Hampshire that turned up asbestos in talc from J&J â âfiberformâÂ actinolite, as he put it. He wrote that talc in general, if subjected to the most sensitive testing method, using concentrated samples, âwill be hard pressed in supporting purity claims.â He described this sort of testing as both âsophisticatedâ and âdisturbing.â, Actress Blair Brown touts Baby Powder in this 1970s-era TV commercial, By 1977, J&J appeared to have tamped down concerns about the safety of talc. The FDA opened an inquiry. Coker had no choice but to dropÂ her lawsuit, Hobson said. (63.49oz Total), Topwon Baby Powder Puff Kit Blue (2 Packed), Caldesene Medicated Protecting Powder with Zinc Oxide & Cornstarch, 5 oz (Pack of 3), Pipette Baby Cream to Powder, Keep Baby's Skin Happy, Talc-Free Baby Powder, Fragrance Free, 3-Ounce, Caldesene Baby Cornstarch Powder With Zinc Oxide 5 oz (Pack of 2), Farmstead Apothecary 100% Natural Baby Powder, Lavender Chamomile 4 oz (Pack of 4), Bee All Natural Organic Baby Powder, Talc-Free, 4-Ounce Bottle…. âIt is quite possible that eventually tremolite will be prohibited in all talc,â Shelley wroteÂ on Feb. 20, 1973, to a British colleague. Just how small hasnât been established. Traumdüfte sind authentisch, rein und unverfälscht. Get your gloves off. He added that he would send it to a scientific ghostwriter âwho will hold it in confidence and rewrite it.â, More Reuters investigations and long-form narratives, Got a confidential news tip? Most patients die within a year of diagnosis. My sister?â. Gluten Free & USDA Organic, Organic Baby Powder by MADE OF – Fragrance Free, Talc Free Baby Powder with Aloe & Argan Oil – Certified Organic Corn Starch Powder (3.4oz, 1-Pack) –Body Powder for Sensitive Skin & Eczema, Burt's Bees Baby Daily Cream to Powder, Talc-Free Diaper Rash Cream - 4 Ounces Tube - Pack of 3, Johnson's Baby Powder for Delicate Skin, Hypoallergenic and Free of Parabens, Phthalates, and Dyes for Baby Skin Care, 9 oz (Pack of 4), Johnson's Baby Powder with Naturally Derived Cornstarch Aloe & Vitamin E, Hypoallergenic, 15 oz, Johnson's Baby Powder with Naturally Derived Cornstarch Aloe & Vitamin E, Hypoallergenic, 9 oz, Johnson's Baby Powder, Hypoallergenic and Paraben Free, 22 oz, Johnson's Baby Powder (2 x 500g) by Johnson's Baby, J&M Gender Reveal Baseball for Baby Showers and Reveal Parties - 100% All Natural Holi Powder (Blue), Topwon 3.5'' Baby After-Bath Powder Puff Kit Container Dispensor Case with Sifter | BPA Free (1 Packed), BPA Free Baby Powder Puff Box, Large 2.8" Fluffy Body After-Bath Powder Case, Baby Care Face/Body Villus Powder Puff Container, Makeup Cosmetic Talcum Powder Container with Hand Holder (Green), Caldesene Medicated Protecting Powder with Zinc Oxide & Cornstarch, 5 oz (Pack of 6), Nature's Baby Organics Baby Powder Talc Free Corn Free Dusting Powder with Aloe Soft Gentle 100% Organic Baby Powder Hypoallergenic Fragrance Free 4 oz Each, 2 Pack, Burt's Bees baby 100% natural dusting powder, 7.5 ounces (pack of 3), 22.5 Ounce, Pure Cornstarch Baby Powder Aloe and Vitamin E (22 oz - 2 Pack), Johnson's Pure Cornstarch Baby Powder 15 Oz + Johnson's Pure Corstarch Travel Size 1.5 Oz, 2 pk, Gejoy 2 Sets After-Bath Powder Puff Box Empty Body Powder Container with Bath Powder Puffs and Sifter for Home and Travel, Baby Anti-Monkey Butt Diaper Rash Powder, 6oz. The study found fewer lung cancer deaths than expected, a result that the authors said supported âthe thesis of no cancerogenic effect attributable to pure talc.â. That approach was summed up by a J&J applied research director in a âstrictly confidentialâ March 3, 1975, memoÂ to managers of the baby products division, which used the talc in J&Jâs signature Baby Powder. Could it happen to us? Thx for watching. While most people exposed never develop cancer, for some, even small amounts of asbestos are enough to trigger the disease years later. âWe have replied,â the doctor wrote, that âwe would not regard the usage of our powders as presenting any hazard.â Such assurances would be impossible, he added, âif we do include Tremolite in more than unavoidable trace amounts.â, The memo is the earliest J&J document reviewed by Reuters that discusses tremolite as more than a scratchy nuisance. Then, in 1992, three years after J&J sold its Vermont mines, the new owner, Cyprus Minerals, said in an internalÂ reportÂ on âimportant environmental issuesâÂ in its talc reserves thatÂ there was âpast tremoliteâÂ in the Hammondsville deposit. It sent tons of its Italian talc to a private lab in Columbus, Ohio, to find ways to improve the appearance, feel and purity of the powder by removing as much âgritâ as possible. Dermablend Loose Setting Powder, Face Powder Makeup & Finishing Powder for Light, Medium & Tan Skin Tones, Mattifying Finish and Shine Control, 1oz 4.5 out of 5 stars 3,781 $29.00 $ 29 . DON'T FORGET TO "LIKE", SHARE, AND SUBSCRIBE!! Before law school, Herschel Hobson worked at a rubber plant. It has blamed its losses on juror confusion, âjunkâ science, unfair court rules and overzealous lawyers looking for a fresh pool of asbestos plaintiffs. âThis philosophy, so far, has allowed us to neutralize or hold in check data already generated by investigators who question the safety of talc.â, Also, the memo said, âwe minimize the risk of possible self-generation of scientific data which may be politically or scientifically embarrassing.â. $1.92 $ 1. Just two months after the Dartmouth professor reported his findings, Windsor Minerals Research and Development Manager Vernon Zeitz wrote that chrysotile, âfibrous anthophylliteâ and other types of asbestos had been âfound in association with the Hammondsville ore bodyâ â the Vermont deposit that supplied Baby Powder talc for more than two decades. !OPEN ME!! Our Asbestos lawyers serving Ann Arbor understand that specific jobsites are the most common source of asbestos exposure, however residents may be also exposed from damaged homes or buildings where asbestos could be disturbed, even household and consumer products such as talc-based baby powder … Abfüllung, Verkopfung, Konfektion werden zu 100% in Handarbeit durchgeführt. A 1979 article in the Journal of Environmental Pathology and Toxicology detailing the findings of the study was not good news for talc. Bicks said: âThe samples that we know of during this time period that contained a fiber or two of asbestos were not cosmetic talc samples.â. As the FDA continued to investigate asbestos in talc, J&J sent powder samplesÂ to be tested at private and university labs. She just wanted to know why. In his email to Reuters, J&Jâs lawyer said the lab supervisorâs concern was that the test would result in âfalse positives,â showing asbestos where there was none. In 1886, Robert Wood Johnson enlisted his younger brothers in an eponymous startup built around the âSafety Firstâ motto. If so, you may have other symptoms that can reveal more information before you … For more than two months, it turned down repeated requests for an interview with J&J executives. Peter Bicks, outside counsel for J&J, told Reuters in an email that for the Vermont study, company ârepresentatives acted in an âeducational and advisory capacityâ to provide the researchers with a realistic study plan.â. The FDAâs own examinations found no asbestos in J&J powder samples in the 1970s. Even so, in a subsequent test of J&J powders in 1976, he didnât find asbestos â a result that Mount Sinai announced. Hammondsville was the primary source of Baby Powder talc from 1966 until its shutdown in 1990. Dermatologist Tested to be Hypoallergenic. Hobson is still practicing law in Nederland, Texas. Some of the lawyers knew from those earlier cases that talc producers tested for asbestos, and they began demanding J&Jâs testing documentation. Before it came in, J&J asked the judge to dismissÂ the case, arguing that Coker had âno evidenceâ Baby Powder caused mesothelioma. In a memo, a J&J lab supervisor said the concentration technique, which the companyâs own researchers had earlier used to identify a âtremolite-typeâ asbestos in Vermont talc, had one limitation: âIt may be too sensitive.â, âNo mother was going to powder her baby with 1% of a known carcinogen irregardless of the large safety factor.â. A few months after Pettersonâs recognition that talc purity was a pipe dream, the FDA proposed a rule that talc used in drugs contain no more than 0.1 percent asbestos. Sanchez, the RJ Lee geologist whose firm has agreed to provide him as a witness in up to 100 J&J talc trials, has testified that tremolite found decades ago in the companyâs talc, from Italy and later Vermont, was not tremolite asbestos at all.Â Rather, he has said, it was âcleavage fragmentsâ from non-asbestiform tremolite. Others have failed to reach verdicts, resulting in mistrials. The jury awarded them $4.69 billion in damages. This hypoallergenic powder is free of parabens, phthalates, dyes or sulfates that may harm your child’s skin and is clinically proven to be gentle and mild on sensitive skin. X-ray scanning is the primary methodÂ J&J has used for decades. The author was Hildick-Smith, the J&J physician executive who had overseen the Italian study and played a key role in the companyâs talc safety research. J&Jâs expert witnesses have concluded the opposite. âWe are certain that the summary will give you assurance as to the freedom from contamination by asbestos for materials of cosmetic talc products.â, In its letter, J&J said samples of talc produced between December 1972 and October 1973 were tested for asbestos, and none was detected âin any sample.â. Shop now! âI said to myself, âHow come it took so long?â â he said. The method is not designed to detect the most commonly used type of asbestos, chrysotile, at all. One official called it âfoolish,â adding, according to a J&J accountÂ of a February 1975 meeting: âNo mother was going to powder her baby with 1% of a known carcinogen irregardless of the large safety factor.â. Though a private lab in Chicago found trace amounts of tremolite, it declaredÂ the amount âinsignificantâ and the samples âsubstantially free of asbestiform material.â J&J reported that finding to the FDA under a cover letter that said the âresults clearly showâ the samples tested âcontain no chrysotile asbestos.â J&Jâs lawyer told Reuters the tremolite found in the samples was not asbestos. Choose from contactless Same Day Delivery, Drive Up and more. The following year, Zeitz reportedÂ that based on weekly tests of talc samples over six months, âit can be stated with a greater than 99.9% certainty that the ores and materials produced from the ores at all Windsor Mineral locations are free from asbestos or asbestiform minerals.âÂ. J&Jâs original records donât always make that distinction.Â In terms of health risk, regulators since the early 1970s have treated small fiber-shaped particles of both forms the same. The CTFA, which now does business as the Personal Care Products Council, declined to comment. J&J also launched researchÂ to find out how much powder a baby was exposed to during a diapering and how much asbestos could be in that powder and remain within OSHAâs newÂ workplace exposure limits. The doctor told Ashton that J&J was receiving safety questions from pediatricians. 4 Ounce (Pack of 1) 4.5 out of 5 stars 8,404. Hildick-Smith told the lead researcher in a June 26, 1974, letterÂ exactly what J&J wanted: data that âwould show that the incidence of cancer in these subjects is no different from that of the Italian population or the rural control group.â, That is exactly what J&J got, Hildick-Smith told colleagues a few months later. Bicks, the J&J lawyer, said the contract labâs results were irrelevant because the talc was intended for industrial use.Â He said the company now believes that the actinolite the Dartmouth professor found âwas not asbestiform,â based on its interpretation ofÂ a photoÂ in the original lab report. In two cases earlier this year â in New Jersey and California â juries awarded big sums to plaintiffs who, like Coker, blamed asbestos-tainted J&J talc products for their mesothelioma. Those tests, however, did not use the most sensitive detection methods. Kretchmer said he recently read that a jury had concluded that Baby Powder was contaminated with asbestos. âHow bad is Tremolite medically, and how much of it can safely be in a talc base we might develop?â. And as the product safety director for J&Jâs talc supplier acknowledged in a 2008 email to colleagues: â(I)f a deposit contains ânon-asbestiformâ tremolite, there is also asbestiform tremolite naturally present as well.â. Both forms often occur together and in talc deposits. In emailed responses, Bicks rejected Reutersâ findings as âfalse and misleading.â âThe scientific consensus is that the talc used in talc-based body powders does not cause cancer, regardless of what is in that talc,â Bicks wrote. I recommend against it because of the risk of respiratory problems. It has maintained in public statements that its talc is safe, as shown for years by the best tests available, and that the information it has been required to divulge in recent litigation shows the care the company takes to ensure its products are asbestos-free. Buy top selling products like Baby Brezza® Formula Pro Advanced Formula Dispenser and Noodle & Boo® 8.8 oz.& Delicate Baby Powder. According to an FDA accountÂ of the meeting, J&J shared âevidence that their talc contains less than 1%, if any, asbestos.â, Later that month, Wilson Nashed, one of the J&J scientists who visited the FDA, Â said in a memoÂ to the companyâs public relations department that J&Jâs talc contained trace amounts of âfibrous minerals (tremolite/actinolite).â. Nutribiotic is safe for children, but more commonly used … Asbestos, like many environmental carcinogens, has a long latency period. Johnsonâs Baby Powder grew out of a line of medicated plasters, sticky rubber strips loaded with mustard and other home remedies. âI recognize the concern,â he told Reuters. âThis is true even if - and it does not - Johnson & Johnson's cosmetic talc had ever contained minute, undetectable amounts of asbestos.â He dismissed tests cited in this article as âoutlierâ results. Michigan's state statute of limitations sets forth the amount time that its residents, including those from Detroit, have to file a Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit. J&J has said it will appeal the recent verdicts against it. This is especially true of talc-based powders, with their small, easily inhaled particles. âWe didnât have it.â. Now, it says, quoting the industryâs standards, that all cosmetic talc products in the United States âshould be free from detectable amounts of asbestos.â, The revised ACS web pageÂ also notes that the World Health Organizationâs International Agency for Research on Cancer classifiesÂ talc that contains asbestos as âcarcinogenic to humans.â, Despite the success of J&Jâs efforts to promote the safety of its talc, the companyâs test lab found asbestos fibers in samples taken from the Vermont operation in 1984, 1985Â and 1986. By 1966, it was blasting and bulldozing white rock out of the Green Mountain state. Since pulmonary disease, including cancer, appeared to be on the rise, âit would seem to be prudent to limit any possible content of Tremolite â¦ to an absolute minimum,â came the replyÂ from another physician executive days later. In 1980, J&J began offering a cornstarch version of Baby Powder â to expand its customer base to people who prefer cornstarch, the company says. Sanchez did not return calls seeking comment. Bicks, the J&J lawyer, said Coker dropped her case because âthe discovery established that J&J talc had nothing to do with Plaintiffâs disease, and that asbestos exposure from a commercial or occupational setting was the likely cause.â. Thatâs one of six minerals â along with chrysotile, actinolite, amosite, anthophyllite and crocidolite â that occur in nature as crystalline fibers known as asbestos, a recognized carcinogen. Thatâs why he zeroed in onÂ Johnsonâs Baby Powder after he took on Darlene Coker as a client in 1997. âHistorically, in our Company, Tremolite has been bad,â Ashton wrote. It does its job by absorbing moisture, which in turn keeps the delicate skin in the diaper area dry and smooth. She did beat the odds, though. An Imerys spokesman said the companyâs tests âconsistently show no asbestos. âShe wanted answers,â her daughter Cady Evans said. What J&J produced in response to those demands has allowed plaintiffsâ lawyers to refine their argument: The culprit wasnât necessarily talc itself, but also asbestos in the talc. Nutribiotic Natural Body & Foot Powder. The edited version was less definitive: âOur talc-based consumer products areÂ have always beenÂ (we cannot say âalwaysâ)Â asbestos free, as confirmed by regular testing since theÂ 1970s.â. !Hey guys! J&Jâs lawyer said the companyâs tests exceed the trade association standard, and they do. Johnson's Baby Powder for Delicate Skin, Hypoallergenic and Free of Parabens, Phthalates, and Dyes for Baby Skin Care, 4 oz. Bicks said the destroyed documents did not include talc testing records. For those and other reasons, J&J couldnât guarantee its Baby Powder was asbestos-free when plaintiffs used it, according to experts, including some who Â testified for plaintiffs. Cornstarch came up again in a March 5, 1974, reportÂ in which Ashton, the J&J talc supply chief, recommended that the company research that alternative âfor defensive reasonsâ because âthe thrust against talc has centered primarily on biological problems alleged to result from the inhalation of talc and related mineral particles.â. Until recently, the American Cancer Society (ACS) accepted the industryâs position, saying on its website: âAll talcum products used in homes have been asbestos-free since the 1970s.â, After receiving inquiries from Reuters, the ACS in early December revised its websiteÂ to remove the assurance that cosmetic talcs are free of asbestos. The proposal to study the health of miners of the Italian talc used in Baby Powder for decades came from William Ashton, J&Jâs longtime talc supply chief. As if that weren’t enough, there’s also actual diamond powder in the mix to impart the prettiest (and subtlest) shimmer. Shop for baby powder body mist online at Target. Our most popular products based on sales. Ten years after tremolite turned up in the Italian talc, it showed up in Vermont talc, too. At various times from thenÂ into the early 2000s, reports by scientists at J&J, outside labs and J&Jâs supplier yielded similar findings. At the time, J&Jâs Baby Powder franchise was consuming 20,000 tons of Vermont talc a year. When Reuters told him about the evidence that had emerged in recent litigation, he said: âThey knew what the problems were, and they hid it.â J&Jâs records would have made a â100% differenceâ in Cokerâs case. Any suggestion that Johnson & Johnson knew or hid information about the safety of talc is false.â. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for example, âmakes noÂ distinctionÂ between fibers and (comparable) cleavage fragments,â agency officials wroteÂ in a response to an RJ Lee report on an unrelated matter in 2006, the year before the firm hired Sanchez. Baby Powder was asbestos-free, it said. It didnât tell the agency that at least threeÂ testsÂ by three different labs from 1972 to 1975 had found asbestos in its talc â in one case at levels reported as ârather high.â. Zeitzâs May 1974 reportÂ on efforts to minimize asbestos in Vermont talc âstrongly urgedâ the adoption of ways to protect âagainst what are currently considered to be materials presenting a severe health hazard and are potentially present in all talc ores in use at this time.â. J&Jâs worry at the time was that contaminants made the companyâs powder abrasive. The FDA declined to comment on the ruling. Gorskyâs comment, echoed in countless J&J statements, missesÂ a crucial point. They shared their preliminary findings with New York Cityâs environmental protection chief, Jerome Kretchmer. Burt's Bees Baby Daily Cream to Powder, Talc-Free Diaper Rash Cream - 4 Ounces Tube - Pack of 3 4.3 out of 5 stars 448 $25.95 $ 25 . Talcâs safe use has been confirmed by multiple regulatory and scientific bodies.â. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), though it dropped the non-fibrous forms of the minerals from its definition of asbestos in 1992, nonethelessÂ recommendsÂ that fiber-shaped fragments indistinguishable from asbestos be countedÂ in its exposure tests. J&J talc products today may be safe, but the talc at issue inÂ thousands of lawsuits was sold and used over the past 60 years. The evidence of what J&J knew has surfaced after people who suspected that talc caused their cancers hired lawyers experienced in the decades-long deluge of litigation involving workers exposed to asbestos. âI suppose I was antagonistic,â Langer told Reuters. âI have it in the back of my mind all the time. Nor did the company tell the FDA about a 1975 report from its longtime lab that found particles identified as âasbestos fibersâ in five of 17 samples of talc from the chief source mine for Baby Powder.